MENU
component-ddb-728x90-v1-01-desktop

Were you confused by the wording of some propositions? Here's what you voted for

Some voters say wording on ads and the ballots themselves may have confused their vote.

While election results may have been what Californians voted for, they may not be what voters in fact wanted.

Our Fox26 Facebook Poll “THIS ELECTION: Were you confused by the ads and the wording on this year's propositions?” currently shows 73 percent voting YES and only 27 voting NO.

Propositions 6,7,8 and 12 seemed to be most confusing for voters.

In Proposition 12, the farm animal confinement initiative, voters were told a “yes” vote was the humane thing to do to give animals like pigs, veal calves, and hens more cage space.

By 2022 the proposition will make hens cage-free altogether, which won the hearts of Californians 61 to 39 percent.

However, what you may have not known is more space means less animals farmers are able to house and the more they're going to have to charge to stay afloat.

That might explain why the farming sector of our state voted against this proposition.

The cost increase looks to be 2 to 4 cents more per egg at the grocery store.

No estimate yet on the increased poultry cost.

More money you're going to have to spend will be on your car, since Proposition 6 - to repeal the gas tax imposed last year - failed.

A tax on fuel, 12 cents for gas and 20 cents for diesel, as well as car fee increases at the DMV of $25-$175 are here to stay.

The tax will bring in $5 billion each year to fund road and highway repairs.

LA and Bay areas voted "no," to keep the tax, while the valley voted "yes" to get rid of it.

The next proposition, Prop 8, weighing in on dialysis clinics and revenue may have confused a few more Californians.

On one hand limiting revenue for clinics, as “vote no on Prop 8” ads pointed out, could be seen as a dis-incentive for clinics to remain open.

But on the other hand, a “yes” vote would have required the surplus of money to be used on the improvement of the facilities and services themselves, for the good of the patients.

Either way looks like dialysis providers will continue to make their money, without having regulations or a cap on revenue and their skyrocketing stocks since the election.

The last proposition you may have been excited about, and now might not be, is Prop 7.

Looks like a win for those who wanted year-round daylight-saving time, but that celebration will have to be put on hold.

Yes, it's passed but it's nowhere near going into effect.

It now must go to the legislature to be approved with a two thirds majority vote, then be signed by the governor.

After that, it goes to congress and then the president then finally federal law has to change to allow for it.

close video ad
Unmutetoggle ad audio on off

Trending